Pelosi’s draft of the changes to the US bailout plan are in (thanks to Calculated Risk):
- $700 billion in two installments, congress can say no if they don’t like what happened to the first one.
- Ownership stake in companies that participate. Looks like preferred but even senior to the senior most debt. (first call on assets)
- No golden parachutes, limits on CEO comp
- Huge oversight by Congress, includes putting transaction details online
- Right to modify owned mortgages (this can severely reduce value and “profitability”)
Not much clarity in terms of specifics but these are fluid times and lots of things can happen before a plan is finally agreed upon. There is lot of voter opposition to any kind of plan – because simply put, there is no more trust. Everyone’s an asshole, especially those in these banks, and this kind of bailout is likely to produce even more hatred once the recession takes control of the general economy. I do not envy the winner of this election.
Note: A lot of people are saying “it’s not a bailout, it’s an asset purchase”. I respectfully disagree. (Which is the formal way of saying, “Puhleeze.”) There is a rescue being mooted, the target of the rescue being current banks. If it was an asset purchase plan, the US could have created a taxpayer owned entity called Mortage Mae or Maggie Mae or whatever, and let it buy everything, funded by T-Bills. And then could have taken it public, sold all of its shares at a hefty price and paid back the t-bills when it made a profit. But that doesn’t help the current banks, no? So it’s a bailout.